what was maizie hironos question to kavanaugh re indigenous peoples
Mazie Hirono releases Kavanaugh electronic mail on native Hawaiians
From CNN'south Tammy Kupperman
Brett Kavanaugh wrote that government programs targeting Native Hawaiians "as a group" is "of questionable validity under the Constitution" and would be "subject to strict scrutiny" in an email sent during his time in the Bush White House.
Kavanaugh was responding to upcoming testimony from a Treasury Department official regarding investment in "Indian Land."
"I remember the testimony needs to make clear that any program targeting Native Hawaiians every bit a group is field of study to strict scrutiny and of questionable validity under the Constitution," Kavanaugh wrote in 2002.
Why this matters: The email, marked committee confidential, was released Thursday morning past the office of Hawaii Sen. Mazie Hirono, in a protestation that may have flouted Senate rules.
Kavanaugh has publicly questioned the indigenous status of Native Hawaiians in the by, including in an op-ed and an amicus brief, and he was pressed on the issue past Hirono in Wednesday's hearing.
Kavanaugh says he hasn't had inappropriate conversations nigh the Mueller investigation
From CNN'southward Manu Raju and Ellie Kaufman
An exchange between California Democratic Sen. Kamala Harris and Judge Brett Kavanaugh on Wednesday night raised questions nearly conversations he may or may non have had about the special counsel'due south investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.
Kavanaugh denies having had any "inappropriate" conversations almost special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation "with anyone." He said that he doesn't "recall any conversations of that kind with anyone at that police force business firm," referring to Kasowitz Benson Torres, the firm founded by President Trump'southward personal chaser Marc Kasowitz.
Sen. Kamala Harris spoke to CNN nearly last dark's exchange with Kavanaugh.
"I have a skillful reason to believe there was a conversation," Harris told CNN.
When asked what she is basing information technology off of, Harris replied: "Information that I've received that's pretty reliable and I asked him a articulate question and he couldn't give a clear answer."
She wouldn't say who the person was — if information technology was Kasowitz himself or Rudy Giuliani. Or provide more details.
She also didn't confirm that she'd bring information technology up again.
Kavanaugh downplays 2003 Roe v. Wade email
From CNN's David Shortell
Judge Brett Kavanaugh downplayed the newly released email showing him commenting on Roe v. Wade while working in the White House.
What he said: Kavanaugh said he was simply questioning the accurateness of a colleague'due south interpretation of the scholarly opinion around the instance.
"The broader point was merely that I think it was overstating something about legal scholars and I'm always concerned with accuracy and I thought that was not quite an authentic description of all legal scholars because information technology referred to all," Kavanaugh said.
He went on to call Roe v. Wade "an important precedent" that has "been reaffirmed many times."
Hither are the Booker documents
Sen. Cory Booker's function just sent out an email linking to 12 pages of the documents that were previously marked "committee confidential."
"As I've been saying from the beginning, this process has been a sham," Senator Booker said in a statement.
He added:
"The fact that tens of thousands of documents revealing a Supreme Court nominee's views on key issues were deemed Committee Confidential and not available to the public reflects the absurdity of this process. The public has a right to access documents about a Supreme Court nominee'southward views on issues that are greatly of import, such as race and the law. This process has demonstrated an unprecedented level of secrecy and opaqueness that undermines the Senate's Ramble duty to advice and consent."
Click here to encounter them.
Coons expects Kavanaugh hearing to go belatedly tonight for 3rd round of questions
From CNN's Kristin Wilson
Programming note: Sen. Chris Coons, D-Delaware, said the Senate Judiciary Committee is expecting to go late into tonight -- 10 or xi p.m. ET. Coons says he and other democrats accept prepped for a tertiary circular of questions, saying that Commission Chairman Chuck Grassley told them if they asked for a tertiary round, he'd allow it.
Booker: "This is about the closest I'll probably ever have in my life of to an I am Spartacus moment"
From CNN'due south Stephen Collinson
The second twenty-four hours of questioning in Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh'south confirmation hearing began with another bitter controversy over the GOP's handling of the process and the beliefs of Democrats seeking to slow his confirmation.
New Jersey Democratic Sen. Cory Booker complained that the late production of documents past the White House about Kavanaugh's work every bit a White House operative nether George Westward. Bush and the failure past the commission to brand some material public had exposed "this process equally a bit of a sham."
In a hit political gambit, Booker said he was willing to break Senate rules and resort to civil disobedience by releasing a document that is merely available to the committee about racial profiling.
"I understand the penalisation comes with potential ousting from the Senate ... I openly invite and accept the consequences of my team releasing that email right now," Booker said.
"This is virtually the closest I'll probably ever have in my life to an 'I am Spartacus' moment," he added afterwards.
Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, objected to Booker's utilise of the word sham.
"Can I enquire you how long you are going to say the same matter three or 4 times?" he asked Booker.
Texas Sen. John Cornyn said that if Booker went ahead he would commit and offense that would be tantamount to releasing classified information.
"Running for president is non an excuse for violating the rules of the Senate," Cornyn told Booker, a potential Democratic candidate in 2020.
Read more hither.
Kavanaugh disputed whether Roe v Wade was settled police in 2003 electronic mail obtained past CNN
From CNN'south David Shortell and Ariane de Vogue
Brett Kavanaugh disputed whether Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Courtroom instance that widely legalized abortion beyond the Usa, was "settled constabulary of the land" in 2003 when he was serving in the Bush White House, according to an email obtained by CNN.
"I am not sure that all legal scholars refer to Roe as the settled law of the land at the Supreme Court level since Court tin always overrule its precedent, and iii current Justices on the Court would exercise and so. The bespeak there is in the inferior court signal," Kavanaugh wrote, responding to a draft op-ed that was circulated for edits between lawmakers and White Business firm staff.
What the draft said: The draft, meant to be submitted under the proper name of "high-profile, pro-option" women in support of a Bush judicial nominee, had said that "it is widely understood accepted past legal scholars across the board that Roe v. Wade and its progeny are the settled law of the land."
The document was first reported past the New York Times.
Meanwhile, senators are over again returning to why certain documents have been designated committee confidential …
Sen. Richard Blumenthal called it "an arbitrary and arbitrary designation."
And Blumenthal says, "eventually they will come out" because he thinks that the archives won't ultimately agree with the designation.
Booker says he is releasing confidential document and is ready to face the consequences
Autonomous Sen. Cory Booker said today he is "knowingly violating the rules" and volition release a document labeled "committee confidential" on racial profiling, one that he asked Estimate Brett Kavanaugh almost last nighttime.
"I knowingly violated the rules that were put forth. I'm told the committee confidential rules have knowing consequences. So, sir, I come from a long line every bit all of usa do every bit Americans of understanding what that kind of civil disobedience is and I empathise the consequences."
Booker says he tin can be ousted for it. "I am earlier your process is finished, I am going to release the e-mail well-nigh racial profiling," he said. "I understand the penalty comes with potential ousting from the Senate."
Why does this matter? Democrats are angry nigh the process of keeping some documents committee confidential.
Scout the moment:
Times obtains leaked Kavanaugh emails on Roe v. Wade, other topics
At the middle of Democrats' unhappiness with how the Kavanaugh hearings have been conducted are documents that were accounted "committee confidential," significant Senators aren't allowed to ask Judge Brett Kavanaugh questions that specifically reference them.
Many deal with Kavanaugh's time in the Bush-league White House. As of last nighttime, they remained individual, even equally Sen. Cory Booker called the process "rigged" and Sen. Kamala Harris offered thinly veiled questions well-nigh one email in particular.
This morn, the New York Times published a story detailing emails from Kavanaugh that addressed hot-button issues such as Roe 5. Wade, affirmative activeness, and the Bush assistants's warrantless surveillance programme.
In one email obtained past the Times, Kavanaugh challenged the accuracy of deeming the Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights determination to be "settled law of the land," the paper reported.
Their publication volition likely give Democratic senators the ability to enquire Kavanaugh specific questions near their contents. They volition probable argue that since they are at present public, they can no longer be deemed confidential.
Source: https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/kavanaugh-hearing-dle/h_acfb2581e0f938516ae96107a1fd704f
0 Response to "what was maizie hironos question to kavanaugh re indigenous peoples"
Postar um comentário